Logo

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Last Updated: 28.06.2025 04:17

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.

Nutritionists Are Sharing Alcohol “Rules” You Should Really Be Following, Including Women Having No More Than One Drink Per Day - BuzzFeed

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.

Why do I feel sleepy after massage?

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?

Love Island Cast Member Leaves the Villa on Day Two - Vulture

Sending ATACMS is WW3.

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.

What is the review of Asitis Atom Power within whey protein?

Russia can stop this any time.

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.

Can you imagine how nervous Kamala Harris must be knowing that in couple of hours she needs to face master debater Donald Trump?

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.

Just in the last 5 years:

We’re secretly winning the war on cancer - vox.com

Let’s just make it real clear:

Thank you.

Any day of the week — including Sundays.

Are LGBT people accepted in Japan?

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?

Switch, Xbox, and the portable future of games - The Verge

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.

What’s next?

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?

CrowdStrike Swings to Loss as Expenses From Last Summer’s Outage Persist - WSJ